Previous Posts
- Exactly my thought...
- EFF Announces Endangered Gizmos List
- Some comments on the VSDA brief.
- Is this what "Resonable Care" is all about?
- Lawsuit to follow...
- It's for your own good
- One loss for the DRM camp?
- One loss for the DRM camp?
- So I guess it all boils down to "reasonable care"?
- Less rights ahead...
3 Comments:
At 2/03/2005 10:23 AM, Anonymous said…
Please explain how any major label will allow their music to be distributed without any restrictions in place.
At 2/03/2005 10:30 AM, PC said…
The same way they allow(ed) music on CDs to be distributed without DRM restriction. There are other types of parameters that can be played with to entice people to buy music legally. They can play on volume, on recurring fees, etc. DRM is not a necessity, particularily if you consider that the non DRM part of the equation is hard to completely hide (Kazaa, Emule, etc.)
At 2/04/2005 10:14 AM, Anonymous said…
Oh right, the same way they got their asses sued the first time. Good idea.
I just think that the major labels are already about as leniant as they're going to get for the foreseeable future with respect to the DRM they insist on to license their music. There's no way this service will roll out with the lack of restrictions that people are speculating on (Plain old MP3 with no DRM whatsoever).
Post a Comment
<< Home